Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Sparse checkout: fix bug with worktree of bare repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:16 PM Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 11:34 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Your proposal is _almost_ the same as my suggestion of eventually
> > making per-worktree config the default. The difference is that you're
> > only making it the default if `core.bare=true` or `core.worktree` is
> > set.
>
> Indeed.  :-)
>
> > But do we need that distinction? If people are comfortable with
> > that, then are they comfortable with simply flipping the switch and
> > making per-worktree config the default today regardless of `core.bare`
> > and `core.worktree`?
>
> This is tempting, at least if we leave core.repositoryFormatVersion as
> 0 (see 11664196ac ("Revert "check_repository_format_gently(): refuse
> extensions for old repositories"", 2020-07-15)) when core.bare is
> false and core.worktree was unset.  However, for that case:

I'll try to respond to this email when I can find a quiet block of
time to really concentrate on what you're saying and reason through it
more thoroughly; it will probably require several read-throughs.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux