> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 7:09 AM John Cai <johncai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This would have the potential of breaking scripts that rely on the current behavior. Presumably, using --no-undefined scripts rely on presumed behavior that doesn't exist. Similarly, using --name-only should expect to return a symbolic name While it's possible, I think it's rare that this would break scripts in an unacceptable way. > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 7:09 AM John Cai <johncai86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since I’m a bit new, I’m wondering how we generally handle these cases? I'm also new so I can't really comment on this :) Though I believe the git suite in general is quite adamant on backwards compatibility
