Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've got some patches locally to convert e.g. write_object_file() to use > the enum, and it removes the need for some callers to convert enum to > char *, only to have other things convert it back. > > So I think for any new APIs it makes sense to work towards sidelining > the hash-object.c --literally caller. Your logic is backwards to argue "because I did something this way, it makes sense to do it this way"?
