On 2021-12-20 at 11:22:32, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > E.g. I've often chimed in on changes to do withn how/whether something > can/should be marked for translation. I added the i18n subsystem > initiall, so for those cases interested parties would probably find me > anyway, but I wouldn't mind being explicit about that. Ditto for people > we consider the authority on certain subsystems, such as (this may not > be any one person currently), refs, the index, SHA1<->SHA256 interop > etc. I have limited time for the list, but I also tend to pop in on certain topics: the SHA-256 transition, commit and tag signing, authentication, translations, and so on. However, outside of the signing code, a lot of that isn't centralized in one place. I also wouldn't be able to commit to signing up for any subsystem in a MAINTAINERS file, but I'm happy to be CC'd if folks think I'm knowledgeable about something or if it's an area they think my opinion would be valuable. I can't speak for others, though, so I don't know if a MAINTAINERS-style approach would be valuable for them. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
