Re: Should update-index --refresh force writing the index in case of racy timestamps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/12/2021 11:44, Marc Strapetz wrote:
Subsequent calls to "git update-index --refresh" or "git status" will invoke the "lfs" filter over and over again, ...

Please forget about the note regarding "git status". cmd_status() will actually fix racy timestamps by calling repo_update_index_if_able(). So the problem is only about update-index.

-Marc



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux