Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sparse-checkout: fix segfault on malformed patterns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Thanks.  The segfault fix matters even more with Elijah's "we can
>> flip between modes" feature, right?
>
> Generally, I think segfaults are a higher priority, but this one is hard
> to find in the wild, I think. I'll send a v4 today and hopefully it makes
> it an easy decision for you.

I agree about the priority and I was assuming that the topics do not
have semantic conflicts we cannot reconcile, but I do not offhand
recall what the other topic did when there patterns unsuitable in
the cone mode when transitioning to the cone mode (or vice-versa for
that matter).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux