The discussion for gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile shows an example string that contains "user1@xxxxxxxxxxx,user2@xxxxxxxxxxx". Asciidoc thinks these are real email addresses and generates "mailto" footnotes for them. This makes the rendered content more confusing, as it has extra "[1]" markers: The file consists of one or more lines of principals followed by an ssh public key. e.g.: user1@xxxxxxxxxxx[1],user2@xxxxxxxxxxx[2] ssh-rsa AAAAX1... See ssh-keygen(1) "ALLOWED SIGNERS" for details. and also generates pointless notes at the end of the page: NOTES 1. user1@xxxxxxxxxxx mailto:user1@xxxxxxxxxxx 2. user2@xxxxxxxxxxx mailto:user2@xxxxxxxxxxx We can fix this by putting the example into a backtick literal block. That inhibits the mailto generation, and as a bonus typesets the example text in a way that sets it off from the regular prose (a tt font for html, or bold in the roff manpage). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> --- Possibly this could actually be done in a separate example block, but I think this looks OK and fixes the most obvious problem. Documentation/config/gpg.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/config/gpg.txt b/Documentation/config/gpg.txt index 4f30c7dbdd..7875f4fccc 100644 --- a/Documentation/config/gpg.txt +++ b/Documentation/config/gpg.txt @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile:: A file containing ssh public keys which you are willing to trust. The file consists of one or more lines of principals followed by an ssh public key. - e.g.: user1@xxxxxxxxxxx,user2@xxxxxxxxxxx ssh-rsa AAAAX1... + e.g.: `user1@xxxxxxxxxxx,user2@xxxxxxxxxxx ssh-rsa AAAAX1...` See ssh-keygen(1) "ALLOWED SIGNERS" for details. The principal is only used to identify the key and is available when verifying a signature. -- 2.34.1.662.g7157fbae24