On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 01:30:40PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Future-proof and clarify the compute_assignment() interface by having > it take a "size_t" for the count of its that it's processing. For the > content itself we need to be able to store a "-1", but there's no > reason we can't use a "size_t" for the size of the number of "int"'s > we've got. Makes sense. I'm happy to see the counts dealt with independently here, and the reasoning that we can use a straight size_t. The earlier refactoring is paying off a bit, though I think it would be possible without it. -Peff
