Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> * en/sparse-checkout-set (2021-12-08) 10 commits > ... >> Need to check the reroll. >> cf. <pull.1151.v3.git.git.1639108573.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> >> source: <pull.1151.v2.git.git.1638908410.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > > I'm confused by the status here; en/sparse-checkout-set already > represents v3, not v2, so you've already picked up the reroll. (v3 is > the one containing both Stolee & Victoria's Reviewed-by.) I think > that also means your cf. should be labeled as the source, yes? And the old one needs to be dropped. I meant to do so after checking the v3 myself but haven't got around to it when the report was sent. >> * es/test-chain-lint (2021-12-09) 19 commits > ... >> >> Broken &&-chains in the test scripts have been corrected. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? > > Eric sent a reroll of just patch 2 with some working clarifications. > It's a small thing, but I think it'd be great if that re-rolled patch > could be picked up and inserted into the series. Other than that, > yeah the series is good to merge down. (Peff and Fabian seemed to > think so too.) Pointers? I know Eric said in <CAPig+cR0eKhz+ncWb4v9dSY0A03P+K0+WT90J2cBKvLqT8DXrA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "I am a bit hesitant about spamming the list", but I do not know what came after it. ... starts a browser and looks ... OK. I found it at https://lore.kernel.org/git/20211211095837.26387-1-sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Will take a look. Thanks.
