[PATCH 12/15] chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tighten here-doc recognition to prevent it from being fooled by text
which looks like a here-doc operator but happens merely to be the
content of a string, such as this real-world case from t7201:

    echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
    echo ourside &&
    echo "=======" &&
    echo theirside &&
    echo ">>>>>>> theirs"

This problem went unnoticed because chainlint.sed is not a real parser,
but rather applies heuristics to pretend to understand shell code. In
this case, it saw what it thought was a here-doc operator (`<< ours`),
and fell off the end of the test looking for the closing tag "ours"
which it never found, thus swallowed the remainder of the test without
checking it for &&-chain breakage.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/chainlint.sed                |  8 ++++++--
 t/chainlint/not-heredoc.expect | 14 ++++++++++++++
 t/chainlint/not-heredoc.test   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 t/chainlint/not-heredoc.expect
 create mode 100644 t/chainlint/not-heredoc.test

diff --git a/t/chainlint.sed b/t/chainlint.sed
index b382746526..2f786f890d 100644
--- a/t/chainlint.sed
+++ b/t/chainlint.sed
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
 # here-doc -- swallow it to avoid false hits within its body (but keep the
 # command to which it was attached)
 /<<-*[ 	]*[\\'"]*[A-Za-z0-9_]/ {
+	/"[^"]*<<[^"]*"/bnotdoc
 	s/^\(.*\)<<-*[ 	]*[\\'"]*\([A-Za-z0-9_][A-Za-z0-9_]*\)['"]*/<\2>\1<</
 	s/[ 	]*<<//
 	:hered
@@ -100,6 +101,7 @@
 	s/^<[^>]*>//
 	s/\n.*$//
 }
+:notdoc
 
 # one-liner "(...) &&"
 /^[ 	]*!*[ 	]*(..*)[ 	]*&&[ 	]*$/boneline
@@ -151,8 +153,10 @@ s/.*\n//
 	/"[^'"]*'[^'"]*"/!bsqstr
 }
 :folded
-# here-doc -- swallow it
-/<<-*[ 	]*[\\'"]*[A-Za-z0-9_]/bheredoc
+# here-doc -- swallow it (but not "<<" in a string)
+/<<-*[ 	]*[\\'"]*[A-Za-z0-9_]/{
+	/"[^"]*<<[^"]*"/!bheredoc
+}
 # comment or empty line -- discard since final non-comment, non-empty line
 # before closing ")", "done", "elsif", "else", or "fi" will need to be
 # re-visited to drop "suspect" marking since final line of those constructs
diff --git a/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.expect b/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.expect
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2e9bb135fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.expect
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
+echo ourside &&
+echo "=======" &&
+echo theirside &&
+echo ">>>>>>> theirs" &&
+
+(
+	echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
+	echo ourside &&
+	echo "=======" &&
+	echo theirside &&
+	echo ">>>>>>> theirs" ?!AMP?!
+	poodle
+) >merged
diff --git a/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.test b/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..9aa57346cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/not-heredoc.test
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# LINT: "<< ours" inside string is not here-doc
+echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
+echo ourside &&
+echo "=======" &&
+echo theirside &&
+echo ">>>>>>> theirs" &&
+
+(
+# LINT: "<< ours" inside string is not here-doc
+	echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
+	echo ourside &&
+	echo "=======" &&
+	echo theirside &&
+	echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
+	poodle
+) >merged
-- 
2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux