Hi Junio, On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > With the reimplementated "git add -i", two test pieces that used to > expect failure now succeed. Mark them as such. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > * Yes, I know this is on hold until some issues in the "add -i" > reimplementation on MacOS are resolved, but as I am getting tired > of seeing "TODO PASSED" when I rebuild and test 'seen', I'll > queue this band-aid at the tip of this topic. As long as we ship the Perl version as an escape hatch, and as long as that version does not pass those two test cases, your patch is premature. I would expect the `linux-gcc` job (or whatever it is called for the next few hours) to fail with this fixup!, as a consequence of running t3701 with the scripted version of `add -i`. Ciao, Dscho > > t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > index 207714655f..1effc3f419 100755 > --- a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > +++ b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ test_expect_success 'split hunk "add -p (edit)"' ' > ! grep "^+15" actual > ' > > -test_expect_failure 'split hunk "add -p (no, yes, edit)"' ' > +test_expect_success 'split hunk "add -p (no, yes, edit)"' ' > test_write_lines 5 10 20 21 30 31 40 50 60 >test && > git reset && > # test sequence is s(plit), n(o), y(es), e(dit) > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ test_expect_success 'split hunk with incomplete line at end' ' > test_must_fail git grep --cached before > ' > > -test_expect_failure 'edit, adding lines to the first hunk' ' > +test_expect_success 'edit, adding lines to the first hunk' ' > test_write_lines 10 11 20 30 40 50 51 60 >test && > git reset && > tr _ " " >patch <<-EOF && > -- > 2.34.1-373-gb739cc97c5 > >
