Lars Hjemli wrote: > On 9/18/07, Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think that writing a real fast-forward merge should only happen on >> dcommit, not git merge, because that is what is required for SVN. >> > > I don't think git-svn has any way of knowing that the user wanted a > merge, unless a merge commit is present. So the user would have to > specify the set of commits which should be considered a merge during > dcommit (this would actually resemble how merges are performed in > subversion). > Sure it can. If you're committing to branch X, and the current tree has a whole lot of commits above that, then it should do the only thing you can do with SVN. Which is write a squash commit, and set the "svn:merge" and/or "svk:merge" properties to represent what happened. > Sidenote: this might be slightly controversial, but I've sometimes > missed a --no-ff option to 'git merge' when working on plain git > repositories; IMHO preserving the 'logical' merge history when the > merge of a topic branch results in a fast-forward can be interesting. If you really want one, use git commit-tree directly. Sam. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
