Hi, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:49:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > However, keeping around _just_ the cnt_data caused only about 100M > > > of extra memory consumption (and gave the same performance boost). > > > > That would be an interesting and relatively low-hanging optimization. > > OK, I will work up a patch. Is it worth making it configurable? Yes, I think it would be worth making it configurable... For example, one of the machines I work on has only 128M. Thanks, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
