Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] branch: inherit tracking configs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Can you two work out the preferred plan, taking relative importance,
> priority, and difficulty between the topics into account, and report
> to us how you want to proceed and why you chose the route once you
> are done?
>
> Unless the plan you two come up with is outrageously bad, such a
> decision by stakeholders would be far more acceptable by the
> community than going by my gut feeling.  In short, I'd prefer
> decentralization ;-)
>
> Having said that, I think this one is a simpler topic that is closer
> to become stable enough than the other one, so it could be that the
> rebases want to go the other direction.

Josh and I have discussed this, and yes, we agree with your assessment.

Rebasing my changes on top of this is also easier from a dependency
perspective because this series has a very obvious interface that I can
use.

I'll send a re-roll soon. Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux