Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As above, because calls to this function are part of the &&-chain in > test bodies, it is important for the &&-chain to be intact in the > function too. It's especially important in this case since this > function is actually checking for specific conditions. As it's > currently written -- with a broken &&-chain -- if the first > test_expect_code() fails, we'll never know about it since that exit > code gets lost; only the exit code from the second test_expect_code() > has any bearing on the overall result of the test. Thanks so much for all the suggestions! I am little beginner in shell scripting. It would help me a lot! > s/messagesdo/messages do/ oops :| > The captured stdout in `out` doesn't seem to be used, so it's probably > better to drop that redirection. okay.
