On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/4/21 12:00 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote: > > From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> > > ... > > ++ > > +Historically, `set` did not used to handle all the necessary config > > +settings, which meant that both `init` and `set` had to be called. > > +Invoking both meant the `init` step would first remove nearly all > > +tracked files (and in cone mode, ignored files too), then the `set` > > +step would add many of the tracked files (but not ignored files) back. > > +In addition to the lost files, the performance and UI of this > > +combination was poor. > > ++ > Super nit: Perhaps update '`set` did not used to handle' to '`set` did not > handle'. Yeah, that sounds better. I'll wait a bit longer for other comments, then send a fix for this along with any other needed fixes (even if just included Acks & Reviewed-bys I get). Thanks!
