Re: diffcore-rename performance mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:58:17AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I thought we were holding counts of hashes, in which case there _is_ no
> > overflow.
> 
> The raw hashval (the fingerprint recorded in struct spanhash) is
> further reduced and used as an index into spahash_top.data[].
> So more than one hashval can try to sit in the same slot in
> spanhash_top.data[] array.

Right, that's sort of what I was hinting at in the original message. Can
we just make the hash table big enough to use the fingerprint hashes
directly? It's going to use a bit more memory, but lookups should be
very fast. I'll try to experiment and get some numbers.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux