Re: [PATCH 01/10] i18n: refactor "foo and bar are mutually exclusive"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 03 2021, Jean-Noël Avila via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jean-No=C3=ABl=20Avila?= <jn.avila@xxxxxxx>
>
> Use static strings for constant parts of the sentences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/checkout.c          | 2 +-
>  builtin/diff-tree.c         | 2 +-
>  builtin/fetch.c             | 2 +-
>  builtin/init-db.c           | 2 +-
>  builtin/log.c               | 4 ++--
>  builtin/submodule--helper.c | 4 ++--
>  builtin/worktree.c          | 2 +-
>  range-diff.c                | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c
> index cbf73b8c9f6..4bd8a57f190 100644
> --- a/builtin/checkout.c
> +++ b/builtin/checkout.c
> @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ static int checkout_main(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
>  				cb_option, toupper(cb_option));
>  
>  	if (opts->overlay_mode == 1 && opts->patch_mode)
> -		die(_("-p and --overlay are mutually exclusive"));
> +		die(_("%s and %s are mutually exclusive"), "-p", "--overlay");

It's good to do all of these, but I think we should really quote the
'%s' while at it. It also helps translators, who without that won't know
(without jumping to the source) if %s and %s are "walking" and "chewing
gum" or something like a CLI option that's quoted :)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux