Lars Hjemli <hjemli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/18/07, Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would automatically enabling --no-ff when it detects merging of two (or > > more) SVN branches be a good thing? > > I'd say 'git-svn merge' as a wrapper for 'git merge --no-ff' would be cleaner. That still involves having to get the user to use something new to avoid shooting themselves in the foot. Perhaps putting a "test -d $GIT_DIR/svn" condition in front of the git-svn call I proposed in git-merge would be alright. If anybody else is thinking about 'git-svn rebase', this is completely different. Using git-rebase alone doesn't allow git-svn users to shoot themselves in the foot like git-merge does. 'git-svn rebase' only serves to minimize typing and brain power needed to operate git-svn. -- Eric Wong - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html