On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:58 PM Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:21:13AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > > ns/tmp-objdir had a re-roll that has not been picked up, at [1] --
> > > perhaps because it's an combination of ns/tmp-objdir and
> > > ns/batched-fsync (it'd be nicer to have those two split). I gave the
> > > ns/tmp-objdir part another read over and was only able to spot two
> > > small things. I think you should mark it as expecting a reroll based
> > > on [2] ("Good catch. I'll fix this.") and [3] ("I'll take this
> > > suggestion."), but I think it could be merged to next quickly after
> > > that.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1076.v9.git.git.1637020263.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CANQDOddCC7+gGUy1VBxxwvN7ieP+N8mQhbxK2xx6ySqZc6U7-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CANQDOdd7EHUqD_JBdO9ArpvOQYUnU9GSL6EVR7W7XXgNASZyhQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > >> Also ns/remerge-diff that is Neeraj's rebase of the
> > >> remerge-diff topic needs Elijah's Ack at least.
> > >
> > > Mark it as expecting a re-roll; I've been waiting for ns/tmp-objdir to
> > > settle so I can rebase on it.
> >
> > I took a quick look at the rerolled one on list, and I agree that
> > keeping tmp-objdir and batched-fsync as two separate topics makes
> > sense, since the former can graduate much more smoothly and quickly,
> > and it can have other dependant topics.
> >
> > So I'll mark all three (ns/tmp-objdir, ns/batched-fsync and
> > remerge-diff) as "Expecting a reroll".
> >
> > As I announced, I won't be taking any new topics or new rerolls
> > today (or possibly tomorrow) until I can sift the topics I've
> > already seen to come up with a tested set of candidate topics to
> > merge to 'next', so there is no need to rush.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I submitted a new PR (with a new mail thread) for ns/tmp-objdir. Hopefully
> that one can sail in smoothly now.
Thanks for sending that out. I wasn't cc'ed on them, and I'm dealing
with multi-day delay of git emails that I'm not cc'ed on, but I read
them over on lore.kernel.org/git and those two patches look good and
appear to me to be ready for next. :-)
> ns/batched-fsync will take a bit more time to settle. I'm going to post a
> new series called ns/core-fsync, which is focused on the extensible interface
> for syncing parts of the tree.
