Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] making --set-upstream have default arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Philip Oakley wrote:

> Can we protect the expectations of a user with a `pushDefault` setting?

Are you talking about 'push.default'? If so, then I think, the proposed
change would not affect the working of 'push.default' (if the idea is
implemented in the right way). I am adding tests to be sure about it. 

> If the user has one set, then the upstream won't be where they push in a
> triangular repo workflow.

Pardon me, I am unable to understand what you are trying to say. Could you
please explain a little bit?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux