Re: [RFC PATCH] vreportf: ensure sensible ordering of normal and error output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:36 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:47 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:05:54AM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > > (1) I don't think the practice is documented anywhere, so people --
> > > including me when I wrote builtin/worktree.c -- might not know about
> > > it. Indeed, we don't seem to be entirely consistent about doing it
> > > this way. Randomly picking submodule-helper.c, for instance, I see
> > > status-like messages going to stdout:
> >
> > Yeah, we've definitely not been consistent here. There's no silver
> > bullet for this aside from vigilance during review, but probably laying
> > out guidelines could help.
>
> Thanks for the reference. I'll take a stab at adding a blurb about
> this to CodingGuidelines.

I just posted a patch which updates CodingGuidelines to talk a bit about this:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20211201053214.2902-1-sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux