On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:39:23PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > I'm not a huge fan of "xmemdup" as I would not have supposed that a > > function called like that would add the extra NUL, so I'm 100% okay with > > someone coming up with any better name. > > xmemdupz()? Why not, it's definitely better than xmemdupasstring ;) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpGV2Jxj3FN7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
