Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This doesn't sound like a typical definition of 'emptiness' to me, but I > can accept it if others also find it compelling. IOW if your definition > of 'emptiness' is compelling enough, then I'll be convinced that there > is no mixing of concerns and there would be no objection. FWIW, I do not find it compelling. I can grant that it might be convenient, but I do not think it is a good idea to explain the reason why the directory is protected is because it is "not empty".
