Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:27 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I had an impression that it was claimed that without this, the other >> weatherbaloon for "for (type var=..." would not fly in some of the >> jobs we have at CI? > > It wouldn't if we have a CI job that tests with gcc < 5 but the last > version of that job died with travis-ci.org I was wondering how Dscho's test was not failing, and that is an easy answer to that question ;-) If we wanted to resurrect that CI job, we can always add it in the CI definition anyway, so I am OK with that, too. Thanks.
