Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm on the fence on how important it is to do these cleanups. IMHO they > are half of what really sells the change in the first place (since the > other bug can pretty easily be fixed without it). Yes. I actually think these have much better value for their complexity, compared to the other "half" of the topic ;-) > But maybe it is piling too much onto what is already a pretty big > change. The cleanups could be done individually later. I am OK with that, too. But I do agree that the series is too big to sit in front of a fix for a bug, for which a much simpler and focused approach has already been discussed, to block it. Thanks.
