Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Sparse Index: integrate with reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 7:39 AM Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This series integrates the sparse index with git reset and provides
> miscellaneous fixes and improvements to the command in sparse checkouts.
...
> Changes since V3
> ================
>
>  * Replace git update-index --force-full-index with git reset update-folder1
>    -- folder1/a, remove introduction of new --force-full-index option
>    entirely, and add comment clarifying the intent of sparse-index is
>    expanded and converted back test
>  * Fix authorship on reset: preserve skip-worktree bit in mixed reset
>    (current patch fully replaces original patch, but metadata of the
>    original wasn't properly replaced)
>
>
> Changes since V4
> ================
>
>  * Update t1092 test 'checkout and reset (mixed)' to explicitly verify
>    differences between sparse and full checkouts

I apologize for my tardiness in reviewing your updated series.  You
have addressed all my feedback from v2 and things look really good.  I
had a couple small questions on patch 7.

As with my previous review, I kinda skipped over the last patch
because I never figured out the cache_bottom stuff.  I read it to see
if there were any obvious mistakes to someone unfamiliar with that
mechanism (i.e. me) but didn't see anything.  I read over the earlier
patches much more carefully.

Anyway, other than patch 7 -- where I only had a minor nit on the
commit message plus two questions (which might result in no changes),
the series looks good.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux