Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.11.2021 23:10, Junio C Hamano wrote:

* fs/ssh-signing-other-keytypes (2021-11-19) 2 commits
- ssh signing: make sign/amend test more resilient
- ssh signing: support non ssh-* keytypes


* fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime (2021-11-18) 10 commits
- ssh signing: verify ssh-keygen in test prereq
- ssh signing: make fmt-merge-msg consider key lifetime
- ssh signing: make verify-tag consider key lifetime
- ssh signing: make git log verify key lifetime
- ssh signing: make verify-commit consider key lifetime
- ssh signing: add key lifetime test prereqs
- ssh signing: use sigc struct to pass payload
- Merge branch 'ad/ssh-signing-testfix' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime
- Merge branch 'fs/ssh-signing-fix' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime
- Merge branch 'fs/ssh-signing' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime

Extend the signing of objects with SSH keys and learn to pay
attention to the key validity time range when verifying.

Will merge to 'next'?


I have some cleanup / code style changes for the ssh siginig test prereq
code like you suggested in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqfsrssmar.fsf@gitster.g/ that would
conflict between these two series. Depending on which lands first or if
the keytpye fix goes into `maint` I could apply it to either one and
rebase the other. Or since it's just style changes I can attach it to
some future ssh signing series. I don't mind either way. Otherwise I
think this is ready for `next`.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux