On 19/11/2021 16:51, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, Philip Oakley wrote: > >> On 15/11/2021 23:19, René Scharfe wrote: >>> Use size_t to match n when building the bitmask for checking whether a >>> rank is occupied, instead of the default signed int. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Ugh, sorry. :( >>> >>> mergesort.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mergesort.c b/mergesort.c >>> index 6216835566..bd9c6ef8ee 100644 >>> --- a/mergesort.c >>> +++ b/mergesort.c >>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void *llist_mergesort(void *list, >>> void *next = get_next_fn(list); >>> if (next) >>> set_next_fn(list, NULL); >>> - for (i = 0; n & (1 << i); i++) >>> + for (i = 0; n & ((size_t)1 << i); i++) >>> list = llist_merge(ranks[i], list, get_next_fn, >>> set_next_fn, compare_fn); >>> n++; >>> -- >>> 2.33.1 >> Looks good to me. >> >> I already had this locally as part of an MSVC (Visual Studio) fix for >> the various C4334 warnings. >> >> The other cases are in object-file.c, diffcore-delta.c (2 occurrences) , >> and repack.c. >> >> My patches are in https://github.com/PhilipOakley/git/tree/oneU_t > How about rebasing the remaining patches from > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/compare/main...PhilipOakley:oneU_t > on top of `rs/mergesort` and then submitting them, to avoid duplicate > efforts? > I'm not finding a `rs/mergesort` at the moment. Any particular remote I should find it on, or maybe a different spelling? P.