René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: >>> The symmetry is compelling, but "always" is quite generic. I can see >>> e.g. someone expecting "git am --always" to imply --keep-non-patch. >> >> What symmetry? > > To have the same option in both producer and consumer. Well, "--always" that stands for "--always-show-header" seeps through to the command line parser from revision.c layer but that is by accident, and is not even documented. We may want to file it as a bug and fix it later. As you mentioned, allow-empty-commit does sound like a much better name.
