On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 04:47:24PM -0800, Neeraj Singh wrote: > It would be nice to loop in some Linux fs developers to find out what can be > done on current implementations to get the durability without terrible > performance. From reading the docs and mailing threads it looks like the > sync_file_range + bulk fsync approach should actually work on the current XFS > implementation. If you want more than just my advice linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a good place to find a wide range of opinions. Anyway, I think syncfs is the biggest band for the buck as it will give you very efficient syncing with very little overhead in git, but it does have a huge noisy neighbor problem that might make it unattractive for multi-tenant file systems or git hosting.
