Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] receive-pack: Clean dead code from update_worktree()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Anders,

looks good, just one suggestion, see inlined.

On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, Anders Kaseorg wrote:

> update_worktree() can only be called with a non-NULL worktree parameter,
> because that’s the only case where we set do_update_worktree = 1.
> worktree->path is always initialized to non-NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/receive-pack.c | 20 +++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> index 49b846d960..cf575280fc 100644
> --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> @@ -1449,29 +1449,19 @@ static const char *push_to_checkout(unsigned char *hash,
>
>  static const char *update_worktree(unsigned char *sha1, const struct worktree *worktree)
>  {
> -	const char *retval, *work_tree, *git_dir = NULL;
> +	const char *retval, *git_dir;
>  	struct strvec env = STRVEC_INIT;
>
> -	if (worktree && worktree->path)
> -		work_tree = worktree->path;
> -	else if (git_work_tree_cfg)
> -		work_tree = git_work_tree_cfg;
> -	else
> -		work_tree = "..";

We might want to make sure that `worktree` and `worktree->path` are
non-`NULL`, and otherwise call a `BUG()`.

> -
>  	if (is_bare_repository())

Okay, I lied, I have two suggestions. Shouldn't this be turned into
`worktree->is_bare`?

Of course, `find_shared_symref()` will currently not return any worktree
with non-zero `is_bare`...

>  		return "denyCurrentBranch = updateInstead needs a worktree";
> -	if (worktree)
> -		git_dir = get_worktree_git_dir(worktree);
> -	if (!git_dir)
> -		git_dir = get_git_dir();
> +	git_dir = get_worktree_git_dir(worktree);
>
>  	strvec_pushf(&env, "GIT_DIR=%s", absolute_path(git_dir));
>
>  	if (!hook_exists(push_to_checkout_hook))
> -		retval = push_to_deploy(sha1, &env, work_tree);
> +		retval = push_to_deploy(sha1, &env, worktree->path);
>  	else
> -		retval = push_to_checkout(sha1, &env, work_tree);
> +		retval = push_to_checkout(sha1, &env, worktree->path);
>
>  	strvec_clear(&env);
>  	return retval;
> @@ -1579,7 +1569,7 @@ static const char *update(struct command *cmd, struct shallow_info *si)
>  	}
>
>  	if (do_update_worktree) {
> -		ret = update_worktree(new_oid->hash, find_shared_symref("HEAD", name));
> +		ret = update_worktree(new_oid->hash, worktree);

Makes sense. If `worktree` is `NULL`, `do_update_worktree` won't ever be
set, and if `worktree` is not `NULL`, even before we remove that
`is_bare_repository()` ternary, it is set to `find_shared_symref("HEAD",
name)` (and `name` is not changed in the `update()` function).

Thanks,
Dscho

>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> --
> 2.33.1
>
>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux