On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 10:10:50PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > The "struct grep_opt" is a mixture of things that would be needed by > all callers of the grep.c API, and quite a few things that only the > builtin/grep.c needs. > > Since we got rid of "prefix_length" in the previous commit, let's move > the "prefix" variable over to "builtin/grep.c" where it's used. To do > this let's create a "struct grep_cmd_opt", which we'll have a pointer > to in a new "caller_priv" member in "struct grep_opt" (the existing > "priv" is used by the top-level "grep.c" itself). I'm definitely in favor of removing specialized, caller-specific bits from an internal API. But I'm not sure why grep.c needs to keep track o this new "caller_priv" field at all. Among the uses of `prefix` in builtin/grep.c, I see grep_source_name, and the call to run_pager(). Would it be more straightforward to pass down prefix from cmd_grep down to its use in grep_source_name? There are quite a few intermediary functions that we go through to get from cmd_grep() down to grep_source_name(). For instance, we could reach it through: cmd_grep -> grep_tree -> grep_submodule -> grep_cache -> grep_oid -> grep_source_name But passing prefix from cmd_grep down to grep_source_name without relying on the internals of grep.c seems like a good direction to me. I could even buy that (ab)using a static variable in builtin/grep.c to keep track of a constant prefix value would save you some plumbing (though I'd rather see the usage spelled out more explicitly). All of that is to say that I share your motivation for this patch and think that the direction is good, but I would have preferred to do it without the caller_priv variable (unless there is something that I am missing here). Thanks, Taylor