Re: move some test-tools to 'unstable plumbing' built-ins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In my experience I *rarely* rely on test-helpers when debugging wedged
> repositories, and much more often end up either in gdb, or in an
> anonymized copy of the repository on a different server. I would imagine
> that others have similar experiences.
>
> So unless we had a much more compelling reason to have the test helpers
> more readily available, I do not think that the risk our users will
> begin to depend on these unstable tools is worth taking.

OK.  It sounds like a sensible argument against such a change.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux