Users very commonly want to sync their working tree with uncommitted changes across machines, often to carry across in-progress work or stashes. Despite this not being a recommended approach, users want to do it and are not dissuaded by suggestions not to, so let's recommend a sensible technique. The technique that many users are using is their preferred cloud syncing service, which is a bad idea. Users have reported problems where they end up with duplicate files that won't go away (with names like "file.c 2"), broken references, oddly named references that have date stamps appended to them, missing objects, and general corruption and data loss. That's because almost all of these tools sync file by file, which is a great technique if your project is a single word processing document or spreadsheet, but is utterly abysmal for Git repositories because they don't necessarily snapshot the entire repository correctly. They also tend to sync the files immediately instead of when the repository is quiescent, so writing multiple files, as occurs during a commit or a gc, can confuse the tools and lead to corruption. We know that the old standby, rsync, is up to the task, provided that the repository is quiescent, so let's suggest that and dissuade people from using cloud syncing tools. Let's tell people about common things they should be aware of before doing this and that this is still potentially risky. Additionally, let's tell people that Git's security model does not permit sharing working trees across users in case they planned to do that. While we'd still prefer users didn't try to do this, hopefully this will lead them in a safer direction. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/gitfaq.txt | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/gitfaq.txt b/Documentation/gitfaq.txt index ae1b526565..e5dab89d6c 100644 --- a/Documentation/gitfaq.txt +++ b/Documentation/gitfaq.txt @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ Windows would be the configuration `"C:\Program Files\Vim\gvim.exe" --nofork`, which quotes the filename with spaces and specifies the `--nofork` option to avoid backgrounding the process. -Credentials ------------ +Credentials and Transfers +------------------------- [[http-credentials]] How do I specify my credentials when pushing over HTTP?:: @@ -185,6 +185,49 @@ Then, you can adjust your push URL to use `git@example_author` or `git@example_committer` instead of `git@xxxxxxxxxxx` (e.g., `git remote set-url git@example_author:org1/project1.git`). +[[sync-working-tree]] +How do I sync a working tree across systems?:: + First, decide whether you want to do this at all. Git usually works better + when you push or pull your work using the typical `git push` and `git fetch` + commands and isn't designed to share a working tree across systems. This is + potentially risky and in some cases can cause repository corruption or data + loss. ++ +Usually, doing so will cause `git status` to need to re-read every file in the +working tree. Additionally, Git's security model does not permit sharing a +working tree across untrusted users, so it is only safe to sync a working tree +if it will only be used by a single user across all machines. ++ +It is important not to use a cloud syncing service to sync any portion of a Git +repository, since this can cause corruption, such as missing objects, changed +or added files, broken refs, and a wide variety of other corruption. These +services tend to sync file by file and don't understand the structure of a Git +repository. This is especially bad if they sync the repository in the middle of +it being updated, since that is very likely to cause incomplete or partial +updates and therefore data loss. ++ +Therefore, it's better to push your work to either the other system or a central +server using the normal push and pull mechanism. However, this doesn't always +preserve important data, like stashes, so some people prefer to share a working +tree across systems. ++ +If you do this, the recommended approach is to use `rsync -a --delete-after` +(ideally with an encrypted connection such as with `ssh`) on the root of +repository. You should ensure several things when you do this: ++ +* There are no additional worktrees enabled for your repository. +* You are not using a separate Git directory outside of your repository root. +* You are comfortable with the destination directory being an exact copy of the + source directory, _deleting any data that is already there_. +* The repository is in a quiescent state for the duration of the transfer (that + is, no operations of any sort are taking place on it, including background + operations like `git gc` and operations invoked by your editor). ++ +Be aware that even with these recommendations, syncing in this way has some risk +since it bypasses Git's normal integrity checking for repositories, so having +backups is advised. You may also with to do a `git fsck` to verify the +integrity of your data on the destination system after syncing. + Common Issues -------------
