Re: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index
From: Johannes Altmanninger <aclopte@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 12:47:10 +0100
Cc: rhodges@xxxxxxxxx, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rphodges@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20211106114202.3486969-1-aclopte@gmail.com>
References: <20211106112439.iw7asj4bq6uwcb3l@gmail.com> <20211106114202.3486969-1-aclopte@gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 12:42:02PM +0100, Johannes Altmanninger wrote:
> +test_expect_success 'apply --intent-to-add is not allowed to modify untracked file' '
> +	echo version1 >file &&
> +	! git apply --intent-to-add <<-EOF

I guess s/!/test_must_fail/

References:
- Re: Re* [PATCH v2] apply: make --intent-to-add not stomp index
  - From: Johannes Altmanninger
- [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index
  - From: Johannes Altmanninger

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Makefile: replace most hardcoded object lists with $(wildcard)
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] apply: make --intent-to-add not stomp index
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux