Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +# U+202a..U+2a2e: LRE, RLE, PDF, LRO and RLO
>> +# U+2066..U+2069: LRI, RLI, FSI and PDI
>> +regex='(\u202a|\u202b|\u202c|\u202d|\u202e|\u2066|\u2067|\u2068|\u2069)'
>> +
>> +! LC_CTYPE=C git grep -El "$(LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 printf "$regex")" \
>> + -- ':(exclude,attr:binary)' ':(exclude)*.po'
> ...
> ! git -P grep -nP '[\N{U+202a}-\N{U+202e}\N{U+2066}-\N{U+2069}]' ':!(attr:binary)'
So you are comparing
* requiring bash and C.UTF-8 locale to be available
vs
* requiring git built with PCRE
assuming that "Dscho says doesn't work with PCRE and you say it
works with PCRE" is resolved? They seem roughly the same
difficulty to me.
