On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:11:44AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Torsten, > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021, Torsten Bögershausen wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0000, Matt Cooper via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > From: Matt Cooper <vtbassmatt@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The filter system allows for alterations to file contents when they're > > > > Some nit-picking: > > looking at > > https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Attributes > > we can read > > "...substitutions in files on commit/checkout." > > > > Should we use this wording here as well ? > > Again, I believe that Matt's command of the English language is pretty > good (but then, I have the advantage of knowing him and I very much enjoy > learning new English words while chatting with him). I would therefore > chalk it up to artistic license when he uses the word "alterations". That was not really what my comment was about. We have exising documentations about Git at other places, and my question was if we can/should/could use the same terminolgy here in the commit message as well. This could make it easier for readers, if the same words are used for the same thing. > > Since you did not comment on the patch, may I assume that you find it > flawless? I could not find any flaws. > > Ciao, > Dscho
