Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > TBH I am not even sure it is worth spending a lot of brain cells on the > "and then consider..." part. Over all these years, we've had one report, > and it simply misunderstand what "--encoding" was for. I thought it was > something we could fix up easily by checking a return value, but IMHO > doing it right is quite tricky because of iconv()'s limited interface, > and the risk of regression outweighs the potential benefit. I tend to agree with the above. Let's not over-engineer things.
