Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: fix places that break compilation in MyFirstObjectWalk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:58 PM John Cai via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Two errors in the example code caused compilation failures due to
> a missing semicolon as well as initialization with an empty struct.
> This commit fixes that to make the MyFirstObjectWalk tutorial easier to
> follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/MyFirstObjectWalk.txt b/Documentation/MyFirstObjectWalk.txt
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ running, enable trace output by setting the environment variable `GIT_TRACE`.
>  Add usage text and `-h` handling, like all subcommands should consistently do
>  (our test suite will notice and complain if you fail to do so).
> +We'll need to include the `parse-options.h` header.

It seems like this change belongs in patch [2/2].

> @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ int cmd_walken(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>         const char * const walken_usage[] = {
>                 N_("git walken"),
>                 NULL,
> -       }
> +       };

Whereas, this change correctly resides in patch [1/2].

>         struct option options[] = {
>                 OPT_END()
>         };
> @@ -195,7 +196,8 @@ Similarly to the default values, we don't have anything to do here yet
>  ourselves; however, we should call `git_default_config()` if we aren't calling
>  any other existing config callbacks.
>
> -Add a new function to `builtin/walken.c`:
> +Add a new function to `builtin/walken.c`.
> +We'll also need to include the `config.h` header:

Should be in patch [2/2].

> @@ -229,7 +231,9 @@ typically done by calling `repo_init_revisions()` with the repository you intend
>  to target, as well as the `prefix` argument of `cmd_walken` and your `rev_info`
>  struct.
>
> -Add the `struct rev_info` and the `repo_init_revisions()` call:
> +Add the `struct rev_info` and the `repo_init_revisions()` call.
> +We'll also need to include the `revision.h` header:

Patch [2/2].

> @@ -624,7 +628,8 @@ static void walken_object_walk(struct rev_info *rev)
>  Let's start by calling just the unfiltered walk and reporting our counts.
> -Complete your implementation of `walken_object_walk()`:
> +Complete your implementation of `walken_object_walk()`.
> +We'll also need to include the `list-objects.h` header.

Also patch [2/2].

> @@ -697,7 +702,7 @@ First, we'll need to `#include "list-objects-filter-options.h"` and set up the
>  static void walken_object_walk(struct rev_info *rev)
>  {
> -       struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options = {};
> +       struct list_objects_filter_options filter_options = { 0 };

Good, this change belongs here in patch [1/2].



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux