Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It's not that libgit.a isn't rebuilt, that part isn't broken, it's built > by the top-level Makefile. It's that if you: > > make -C contrib/scalar > > And then change anything it depends on, short of the top-level > rebuilding libgit.a it won't be re-built, so for anyone hacking on it > that Makefile is rather useless. Is this merely an example, or is this the only thing you cared about the build procedure? >> I would still like to invite you to think along more productive lines. >> It's not about where Scalar's build mechanics are right now. It's where we >> can take _Git_ to do what Scalar already does. > > That's also interesting, but right now we're not discussing that > subsequent set of patches, but your integration of scalar in-tree. Let's > fix those issues first.
