Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Various operating modes of "git reset" have been made to work >> better with the sparse index. >> >> Needs review. > > This topic had good review in its first three versions, and the > current v4 has had one response that doesn't seem to have actionable > changes. Could you re-evaluate if the "needs review" label is still > appropriate? The label indeed does not read well. I know there was a lot of dicussions on v3 but in the list traffic, but I do not see anybody looked at v4 and said that the issues they pointed out in v3 are now covered to their satisfaction. Probably "Needs ack" may have shown what I meant better? Thanks.
