> Did you mean to send the same patch text (but with an updated log > message)? Just making sure. Yes, exactly. > We are all imperfect human and anything we do is merely "trying to" Fair point. :-) Do you want me to resend the patch without this part or is it ok ? Thank you ! Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 17:55, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Robin Dupret <robin.dupret@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Try to make reading the computation of the gzipped flag a bit more > > natural. > > ... and did you succeed? ;-) > > We are all imperfect human and anything we do is merely "trying to", > so let's not say "try to", unless the change is so involved that it > is hard to judge if the result has succeeded in trying. > > Did you mean to send the same patch text (but with an updated log > message)? Just making sure. > > Thanks; will queue. > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Dupret <robin.dupret@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > http-backend.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/http-backend.c b/http-backend.c > > index e7c0eeab23..3d6e2ff17f 100644 > > --- a/http-backend.c > > +++ b/http-backend.c > > @@ -466,9 +466,7 @@ static void run_service(const char **argv, int buffer_input) > > struct child_process cld = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT; > > ssize_t req_len = get_content_length(); > > > > - if (encoding && !strcmp(encoding, "gzip")) > > - gzipped_request = 1; > > - else if (encoding && !strcmp(encoding, "x-gzip")) > > + if (encoding && (!strcmp(encoding, "gzip") || !strcmp(encoding, "x-gzip"))) > > gzipped_request = 1; > > > > if (!user || !*user)
