Re: [Summit topic] Server-side merge/rebase: needs and wants?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/10/21 18.56, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
  5.  The challenge is not necessarily the technical challenges, but the UX for
      server tools that live “above” the git executable.

      1. What kind of output is needed? Machine-readable error messages?

      2. What Git objects must be created: a tree? A commit?

      3. How to handle, report, and store conflicts? Index is not typically
         available on the server.

1) I prefer human-readable (i.e. l10n-able) output, because the output messages for server-side merge/rebase are user-facing.

2) Same as when doing merge/rebase on local machine (merge commit if non-ff).

3) I think because on the server-side we have bare repo (instead of normal repo), we need to create temporary index just for merge/rebase. For conflicts, the users need to resolve them locally, then notify the server that they have been resolved, and continue merging process.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux