On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:58:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > However, it is tricky to arrange, as the command already takes > multiple --sort keys, and the laster ones are taken as more > significant sort order, so it is tricky to come up with two keys A > and B such that --sort=A --no-sort --sort=B will produce one order, > while --sort=A --sort=B will produce another different order. Yeah, I faced something similar with 7c5045fc18 (ref-filter: apply fallback refname sort only after all user sorts, 2020-05-03). I suspect you could use the same keys as those tests, though I am OK if we simply leave it as a quietly-fixed bug. -Peff
