Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I tried to structure this as somethnig that could be merged or queued > up separately, but the semantic conflict in "branch.c" was difficult, > as Junio's patch changes how those variables are managed. I tend to agree that it would have been simpler if you did 1, 2 and 4 first and then rebased 3 on top, possibly as an "after the dust settles" separate topic. The releasing of these allocated pieces of memory does make sense. Thanks.
