Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I generally consider any interaction with the commit-graph while >> replace refs are enabled to be the bug. We don't read the commit-graph >> when replace refs are on, so why are we verifying it? >> >> But, I understand the desire to check the on-disk content even though >> it is not being used, so disabling replace refs to do the verify should >> be sufficient. > > That's quite a sensible argument. Sounds like we have a way to > solve this that everybody agrees with. Would it be sensible to silently ignore, though? Would a warning, when we see replacement is in use and an explicit request by an end user is made to make use of or update the commit-graph, be too loud?
