Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> So do you want this forked from v2.33.0 (and merged to 'maint' so >> that v2.33.2, if we need to issue it, would have it)? > > Well, I followed your custom and based it on the oldest applicable topic, > js/ci-windows-update. My preference would be for this to be merged into > `maint` rather sooner than later, so that GitGitGadget PRs could target > `maint` and get a meaningful test coverage. Yes, will do. Tonight's pushout did not have it in 'next', but I do not think of a reason why we shouldn't fast-track the topic. Thanks.
