Re: Possibly wrong assignment in config.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrea Monaco <andrea.monaco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> config.c: In function 'git_config_copy_or_rename_section_in_file':
> config.c:3358:17: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
>  3358 |       output[0] = '\t';
>       |       ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~

Hmph, with a wider context, I think the tool is pointing at the
assignment found here?

	while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), config_file)) {
		unsigned i;
		int length;
		int is_section = 0;
		char *output = buf;
		for (i = 0; buf[i] && isspace(buf[i]); i++)
			; /* do nothing */
		if (buf[i] == '[') {
			/* it's a section */
			int offset;
			...
			offset = section_name_match(&buf[i], old_name);
			if (offset > 0) {
				...
					output += offset + i;
					if (strlen(output) > 0) {
						...
						output -= 1;
						output[0] = '\t';
					}
				} else {
					copystr = store_create_section(new_name, &store);
				}
			}
			remove = 0;
		}

Inside the "if (buf[i] == '[')" block, i is not negative, and inside
the "if (offset > 0)" block, offset is positive.  So "output +=
offset + i", unless offset and i are so huge to cause integer
wraparound, would only be incrementing offset by some positive
integer.  So immediately after "output += offset + i", output is at
least buf+1, if not larger, and &output[-1] is at least pointing at
&buf[0], no?

Or is the tool worried about integer addition (offset+i) wrapping
around?

Or I may need a bit more caffeine, perhaps?  I am puzzled...

Thanks.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux