Re: [PATCH v2] sparse index: fix use-after-free bug in cache_tree_verify()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/7/2021 11:05 AM, Phillip Wood wrote:
> Hi Stolee
> 
> On 07/10/2021 14:53, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> On 10/7/2021 5:50 AM, Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ...
>>> diff --git a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
>>> index 886e78715fe..85d5279b33c 100755
>>> --- a/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh
>>> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout and reset (mixed) [sparse]' '
>>>   test_expect_success 'merge, cherry-pick, and rebase' '
>>>       init_repos &&
>>>   -    for OPERATION in "merge -m merge" cherry-pick rebase
>>> +    for OPERATION in "merge -m merge" cherry-pick "rebase --apply" "rebase --merge"
>>
>> I spoke too soon. On my machine, the 'git rebase --apply' tests fail
>> because of some verbose output that does not match across the full
>> and sparse cases. Using "rebase -q --apply" works for me.
> 
> Oh, that's strange, the CI tests pass on gitgitgadget and that script passes locally for me. Do you know what the output is that does not match?

It's entirely possible that it's something in git-for-windows/git or
microsoft/git that is causing the difference:

+ diff -u full-checkout-out sparse-checkout-out
--- full-checkout-out	2021-10-07 13:37:00.475394970 +0000
+++ sparse-checkout-out	2021-10-07 13:37:00.531396095 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
 First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
 Applying: update folder1
+Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
+Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
+Merging:
+e1886b3 update folder2
+virtual update folder1
+found 1 common ancestor:
+virtual b4ad7e16921c16e36f1d5d45ea4fa186efa8422a
 Applying: update deep
+ return 1
error: last command exited with $?=1

[1] https://github.com/microsoft/git/runs/3827705316?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:10469

Thanks,
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux